If only greed doesn’t interfere

Recently I was reading an article in Toronto Star about our weaning faith in human ingenuity. For a moment, fear and disappointment froze me and put me out of action. But I recovered soon enough to realize that our faith in human ingenuity may be in short supply, but there is no short supply of human ingenuity.

The article quotes Nouriel Roubini, the distinguished professor of Economics at Harvard University as having said in his web site “One cannot rule out a systematic collapse and a global depression.”

That’s one hell of a depressing remark. What makes it eerie is that his prediction about global economic meltdown in the year 2006 has come to pass very accurately. So much so that governments all over, seek an appointment with him to take his counsel in these turbulent times. 


He goes further to say that the way the economy moving, its state would be even worse than what he has predicted 2 years ago. But of course Mr. Roubini has admitted that he is a confirmed pessimist. He says he came to this conclusion after extensive research and analysis of the then available data and trends.

But I am a born optimist. I don’t have the qualifications, experience, or reach of Mr. Roubini but my strong sense of intuition says that the world will overcome its difficulties and emerge stronger.  Apart from my intuition, I also put trust in creativity of humanity as a whole to solve problems of this size.
And I would like to quote Edward De Bono in his book ‘Serious Creativity’, in support of my trust. 

When he talks about the need for creativity he says,
” …. whenever we look at the world we are only too ready to see the world in terms of our existing patterns … That is what makes perception so powerful and so useful. We can recognize most situations. This is also why the analysis of information will not yield new ideas. The brain can only see what it is prepared to see (existing patterns). So when we analyze data we can only pick out the idea we already have.”

We should not stand paralyzed with fear or self pity or resist what is happening.  I am forced to repeat the trite saying, “We do what we have got to do.” The following story makes this point very clearly.

Courtesy driver Douglas Prasher at one of the Toyota dealerships in Huntsville was once a research scientist who collected jelly fish for its strange glow. During the course of his research he isolated and copied the gene responsible for its strange glow. He believed that this property could be used to highlight molecular functions that are otherwise invisible.


As fate would have it, his research grant ran out, with NASA slashing his funding. With mounting bills to be paid, he did what he thought was the sensible thing to do. He took a job as a courtesy driver so that he can make some promising business contacts.

But he also did the noblest thing in my opinion, in turning over the gene he isolated, to this year’s Nobel Laureates in Chemistry, Chalfie, and Tsien for further research. At a news conference in San Diego after winning the award, Tsien said Phrasher’s work made the research that led to the Nobel Prize possible.
Imagine being left out of the team that went on to win the Nobel Prize. But this doesn’t bother Phrasher one bit. Remember he faced his Great Depression in his life at one point. But still he did what he had to do.

If every one of us like Phrasher goes with the tide doing what best one can do, instead trying to swim against it, there will be abundance of opportunity.

The point is our resourcefulness is not in short supply.

The world will survive and prosper provided greed doesn’t interfere once again.

Why do women wear high-heeled shoes?

Recently I read an article in Time titled “‘Tis the Season of Six-Inch Stilettos” that goes in some depth as to why women wear those Stilettos.

As the article points out,  the reasons are many:

  • Women want to project an image that is both powerful and feminine.
  • To be fashionable, to overcome peer pressure or to satisfy their need for  vanity.
  • Long legs communicate a healthy youth and good breeding potential.
  • Women enjoy sex more, if they walk in high heeled shoes. Because according to an Italian study, it conditions the pelvic muscles.

Sometimes it comes in handy as a tool to protect oneself ( Stiletto in Italian means dagger ) from sexual predators. That’s my understanding from seeing movies.


However none of these come close to what I learnt from a TV commercial (Shopping Channel) or a TV Program ( one of those makeover programs for women). I don’t remember which one. But it gave a very scientific explanation of why women wear high-heeled shoes.

I am a student of science and I always appreciate a scientific explanation.

To share my knowledge with you using an illustration, I did an exhaustive research. I was looking for images of women in high heeled shoes that would prove the point as to why they need them.
It might surprise many of you, I could not find any illustration that would do justice.

  • If the shoes are good, women are not so attractive.
  • If the women are good looking, shoes are ugly.
  • If they are both good, the photograph is too suggestive that they pander to carnal desires. You may want to look at them, but I have some editorial standards to maintain you know?
  • or they don’t strike a pose that would explain the scientific theory behind wearing those shoes.

After much sifting, this image came close to what I had in mind.

You can see  the young woman in a cocktail dress walking gracefully in her stiletto. What actually happens is that the high heeled shoes lifts her body upward and tilts it forward (resulting in her bust thrusting forward). If she lets go without counteracting it, gravity will pull her forward and she will eventually fall on her face. So to nullify this forward pulling force, she jets out her posterior as a counterbalance. This she does naturally without conscious attempt, resulting in a grace that we all appreciate.

There is a happy coincidence in this delicate balancing act, that her breasts and butt project outward making  them even more attractive. Even those women who are not so physically endowed look attractive in them.

So there you have it.  The reason behind their inexplicable obsession with possessing many pairs of high heeled shoes.


If you ask them,”Honey are you comfortable in those shoes?”  they will more likely ignore that question and counter that with “How do I look?’

Evil starts with complacency

Up front I must be honest with you. While the rest of this article is mine, the title of this post belongs to my friend and colleague at my office. While we were discussing about corporate scandals, he said that he cannot state with any level of certainty that God exists. But he knew for sure that evil starts with complacency. 

Reflecting on what he said about corporate scandals I tend to agree with him. Today we have reached a situation where we treat the venerable financial statements as myths and start to wonder how much of them are true.


At any of the following stages in the evolution of a corporate scandal, person or persons involved could have blown the whistle and let the investing public and authorities concerned know that something is amiss and needs some review/investigation.
But they prefer to remain complacent and do nothing.

Stages of corporate downfall:

  1. Idea being conceived in the brain storming sessions of corporate ‘smarts’ (Example: Morgan Chase thought of offloading the risk from their balance sheet to banks as assets or Enron conceived the idea of selling Energy as a commodity)
  2. Plan executed with finesse in total secrecy and promoted as the next big thing.
  3. Investors being led to believe that it is a now or never opportunity. ( Example: banks/insurance companies/pension funds vie with each other to carry the risk offloaded by investment banks as assets on their balance sheets)
  4. Top executives show spectacular results from quarter to quarter and award themselves impressive cash bonuses or stock options in so far the going is good.
  5. Employees tend to believe and go with whatever good news management doles out to them. They show their enthusiasm by enhancing their contribution to the 401(K) plans
  6. Auditors (both internal and external) certify that to the ‘best of their knowledge’ the statements presented to them are true and accurate. (Arthur Andersen did an excellent job in certifying Enron’s financial statements. I wonder who the auditors of Nortel Networks were. Thanks to them restating of financial statements became fashionable.)
  7. News media/ investment analysts gobble up stories presented by the management of such ‘excellent’ companies and award ranks for ‘performance’. (One notable exception being the story ‘how exactly Enron gets its revenue? in Fortune Magazine.
  8. A year or two goes by and then word slowly gets around that things are not as rosy as they are painted out to be. Top executives manage to get themselves fired with excellent severance pay.
  9. Stock prices nose dive. Since the top executives have already been safely bailed out, it is now time for the government to work out the bail out details of the corporation.
  10. Finally employees and investing public are left holding the bag not knowing what to do next.



I am sure in any of the above stages there are a few honest souls with a troubled conscience who would only be too relieved to blow the whistle. But they would have been restrained from doing so for fear of consequences.

I think in the Internet age it is not difficult to post anonymously about things going wrong in the corporate world. Even if this is considered to be too risky, they can give notice about failing entities in a circuitous (hush-hush) fashion giving appropriate clues for the readers to solve the puzzle.

My sincere request for the people ‘in the know’ is to speak up before it is too late.

Borderless State

“People were there earlier and border came later.” Well, that was the reply I got from my German friend when I asked him, “What would it feel like to be in the then East Germany” We were standing right at the border (you can say no man’s land) of the then divided East and West Germany in March 1987.  And that was in Goslar a small town, about hundred kilometers east of Hanover.

I was looking for some sign of emotion (triggered by poignant memories) from him as he was replying my question. But he didn’t betray any. He meant the Germans on the east are no different from them on the west. They (East Germans) accepted their lot, went about their business as if nothing happened.  He spoke like Spock in the Star Trek episodes, matter-of-fact, business-like and driven by cool logic.


Earlier in the day he invited me to his house. I was going through his bookshelf and picked up a book (illustrated) on German history written in English.  He was feeling embarrassed and requested me not to read any further. When I said a few words of praise for the Germans: their discipline, their devotion to perfection, their patriotism, he offered to take me to some place I would be interested to see. So there we were at the border.

Actually I was the one who became emotional, sympathetic to the people locked behind the Iron Curtain. I could see houses so close to the border, if I had waved or yelled ‘hi’, someone would have seen or heard me. I was tempted to taste the forbidden fruit. I wanted to see what was on the other side, even though everything was there in plain sight for anyone to see. I was looking to see if any souls were moving around in the neighborhood and say ‘hello’ to them. I got closer and closer to the barbed wire fence, ignoring the watch tower.


Suddenly my friend yelled at me to stop, else I will be shot from the other side. I knew enough to stop, for the Germans always meant business. Remember even President Reagan made his speech at the Brandenburg Gate on the 12th June 1987, in front of two panes of bulletproof glass protecting him from potential snipers in East Berlin. I requested my friend to take a snap of me near the border. Lucky I am alive to tell you the story now, after more than 20 years.

I didn’t know at that time that in a few months this separation will become history and history will be made.  And that people will be clamoring for a piece of the German Wall to keep it for posterity as a souvenir. Some will be sold on the EBay making a neat profit for their owners. Had I known it then, I would have taken a piece of the fence with me. If only they had allowed me to take my piece of rock. What do you say?

An unexplored life is not worth living

I intend to visit Brazil for vacation before my retirement. That begs two questions to be answered: 

1. Why Brazil?

2. Why not after retirement?

The answer to the first: I think of its beautiful carnival dancers in bikinis and Brazil’s breathtaking beaches to soak in.

To answer the second: Please see the answer to the first.


But I didn’t realize that until recently (mid 1990s) the crime rate in Brazil was very high. Watching the movie City of God changed my view of the country. If it is not safe enough for the local residents, how would it be for the visiting tourists? I am sure you will agree that it is not a good idea to get shot and come back in a coffin after a memorable vacation. Imagine you won’t be around to answer the question, “How was your vacation?”

I am not exaggerating. Some of us Canadians had that privilege extended to us as part of the package tour, when we visited Mexico three/four years ago. To this day, they are investigating the cases to figure out the answer to the classic / cliché question, “who dun it?” When Mexico tourism promotes itself as “Mexico, beyond your expectation,” it is probably true to its words.

Meanwhile it is reassuring to note (as this article points out) that Brazil’s crime rate has fallen considerably. Hopefully by that time I visit, it has fallen so low, that it will be like I am in my city Toronto. Apart from the deliberate actions of the community of Brazil, its police and change in demographics, I think one other reason for the fall in crime rate could be its rising middle class and Brazil’s improving economy.

Some of my readers who have firsthand experience may contradict whatever I said here. Before I could agree/disagree with them I want to find out for myself. An unexplored life is not worth living, what do you say?

Lipstick on a pig

You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.” – Barak Obama
After this remark, amidst the claims of Democratic supporters and counter attacks of Republicans, here is an imaginary conversation that never took place.
McCain: Barak, I knew that your reasoning abilities were suspect. But I didn’t know you were blind too.
Barak: I meant with you being in charge there is effectively no change in leadership.
McCain: You must be foolish to deride our assets in Alaska.
Barak: I meant your policies are no different from that of Mr. Bush.
McCain: You are against feminism.
Barak: No, I meant America under your leadership will be no different than under our current leadership.
McCain: You support abortions.
Barak: No, I meant with your policies we will be lead along the same ruinous path that we are on currently.
McCain: You are against teenage pregnancies.
Barak: No, No, I meant I love my country too much to leave it in the hands of amateurs.
McCain: You are against our fundamental right to bear arms.
Barak: No, for God’s sake I meant America cannot afford anymore extravaganza.
McCain: You are against beauty contests.
Barak: No, I meant…. Never mind what I meant.
Arnold (Pointing to himself): This Governor would have done a better job wearing a lipstick. (looking at McCain) Why didn’t you think of me?
McCain: But Arnie, I thought….
Arnold: You thought what? I even bore a child in one of my movies. So you can even say I am against abortions. Besides I proposed you over Rudy. Remember?
McCain: I am sorry Arnie, but you’re the man. I have you in my mind and in my term I will amend the constitution just for you. I promise.
Bush: Guys, look what I found. If you dress up a scarecrow in jeans it is still a scarecrow!


It is in our ability to think

We take it for granted our ability to think. Often it happens unconsciously i.e. we don’t even know that we are doing it until we bring it into focus (like when we breathe). As much as it is a blessing it turns into a curse if done unconsciously.If we inspect our thoughts, too many of them are repetitive and destructive. We brood over our lack of resources, past failures, betrayals, missed opportunities, etc. They only generate a sense of self- pity, anger, jealousy etc with nothing constructive coming out of them.  I am sure you would have read enough literature on similar lines, so I don’t want to repeat what you know already.

The purpose of this post is to remind you (also remind myself) to be cheerful, look for possibilities when presented with a problem, solve it in a creative way and become wiser. What better way to learn to appreciate our ability to think, then to watch an animal which is endowed with even lesser faculties than we have, that goes about solving problems.

Recently I saw a video clip (see below and click on play) in which a chimpanzee does a courier job. Let me admit that I don’t know the Japanese language as well as the purpose of this experiment (if I can call it as one) as all the commentary of the events is in that language. However as we see the clip; we can get a feel of the situation, draw conclusions and we won’t be far off the mark.


Here is my interpretation of the events:

Pan fails to notice how the package (lunchbox) is tied on the carrier (James in our case) for safe delivery
Still it takes its job seriously and later it makes it up by its persistence. It didn’t come back with some lame excuses for a failed mission.
When coming to an intersection, it decides to go one way after some deliberation. May be it had drawn from past experience or intuition. I don’t know which one. The point is it didn’t choose to remain stuck in one situation.
When it was time to cross the stream or creek, (a very complex operation for its intelligence) Pan chooses to pause and think for a minute and evaluate the risks involved. It chooses a course of action that minimizes the risks for everyone involved (James in this case).
Every step of the way Pan gives its due attention (and not lost in its thoughts about its past or future)
When it was sure that James could jump the last 1 meter, it uses all its persuasion (force in this case). I am sure Pan would have used other methods to persuade James if it can communicate with it (James). 
Finally Pan takes pride for a job well done (no matter how trivial or menial and not giving itself to thoughts of self-pity like “why me?”).

Incidentally did you notice that it didn’t miss to have fun while doing its job.
P.S. Those of my readers who know Japanese language if you could enlighten me/us about the actual experiment and commentary of events as they happen, I will be very thankful.